VendorCensus
Menu

Microsoft Dynamics 365 customers list: CRM and ERP evidence

Explore sourced Microsoft Dynamics 365 company relationships. Separate Sales and Customer Service from Finance and Supply Chain Management.

Sources reviewed 2026-09-20

Published Dynamics 365 relationships. Publication context can predate this source review.

3 covered companies

Distinct companies, deduplicated across CRM and ERP.

3 matching

Companies after your filters.

CRM and ERP separated

Application scope is shown on each source record.

Changes in the last 90 days

History unavailable. This window runs from 2026-06-22 to 2026-09-20. Our reviewed baseline begins 2026-09-10. Additions, removals, switches, and net change cannot yet be calculated. This does not mean there were zero changes.

Explore Dynamics 365 company evidence

Employee counts refer to source publication periods, not current headcount.

5 matching source records

Public-source observations. Observation dates are review dates, not adoption dates.
CompanyVendor / signalIndustry / scopeObserved (UTC)Evidence
MaxLinearmaxlinear.com1,000–9,999 employees, per source · 2025-03-11 customer story · Headcount source ↗United States, per sourceMicrosoft Dynamics 365Presence observedManufacturingDynamics 365 Sales and Customer ServiceCustomer story
Evidence notes

The March 2025 Microsoft story names Sales and Customer Service alongside ERP applications. It does not establish a new September 2026 purchase.

MaxLinearmaxlinear.com1,000–9,999 employees, per source · 2025-03-11 customer story · Headcount source ↗United States, per sourceMicrosoft Dynamics 365Presence observedManufacturingDynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain ManagementCustomer story
Evidence notes

The March 2025 story reports migration from AX 2012. Historical AX use is excluded from the presence sample.

Kurt J. Lesker Companylesker.com500+ employees, per source · 2024-10-11 customer story · Headcount source ↗Microsoft Dynamics 365Presence observedManufacturingDynamics 365 SalesCustomer story
Evidence notes

The October 2024 story reports Sales as part of the first migration phase. It is company-level evidence, not a license or contract count.

Kurt J. Lesker Companylesker.com500+ employees, per source · 2024-10-11 customer story · Headcount source ↗Microsoft Dynamics 365Presence observedManufacturingDynamics 365 Finance, Supply Chain Management, and Project OperationsCustomer story
Evidence notes

The October 2024 story describes completed migration from AX to these applications. Exact migration date is not inferred.

G&J Pepsigjpepsi.comUnited States, per sourceMicrosoft Dynamics 365Presence observedFood and beverageDynamics 365 Sales and Field ServiceCustomer story
Evidence notes

Microsoft’s August 2024 story describes the independent franchise bottler’s deployment beginning in 2021. This is not a claim about all PepsiCo businesses.

Companies using Microsoft Dynamics 365 and CRM

This sample covers MaxLinear, Kurt J. Lesker Company, and G&J Pepsi. Microsoft’s customer stories name specific applications, so the directory separates CRM-related deployments from ERP. Counts use distinct companies even when a source supports more than one application group.

Dynamics 365 is a product family. Evidence of Finance or Supply Chain Management does not establish Sales or Customer Service use. Only records supporting CRM applications enter our cross-provider CRM directory.

From Dynamics AX to Dynamics 365

The MaxLinear and Lesker sources report migration from AX. Those narratives establish historical transitions in the scope they describe; they do not supply a complete recent movement panel or a day-by-day migration timeline.

The AX directory preserves those earlier relationships as historical records. We do not label an AX deployment as an active Dynamics 365 account without separate evidence.

Scope, dates, and company matching

G&J Pepsi is an independent franchise bottler. Its story does not establish a group-wide PepsiCo deployment. Lesker and MaxLinear size figures are reported by the linked stories and may differ from current headcount.

Every row links to a source and a review date. The review is our check of a public page, not verification of the company’s private contract status. Use the filters to choose CRM or ERP before comparing providers.

Explore related research

What the evidence can tell you

A public job board supports an ATS observation. A subprocessor disclosure identifies a provider that may process data for particular services. A vendor customer story describes a published relationship. These sources have different scopes and are labeled separately.

Counts cover the records on these pages, not the whole market. No observation in our covered sources does not mean a company does not use a vendor. Source recency and unresolved conflicts affect confidence; observations do not establish spend, renewal timing, or customer churn.

Read our methodology · Understand coverage

Start with the evidence.

Create a free VendorCensus account. The public research above is available without signing in.

Create a free account